Translate

Monday, June 15, 2026

Playful archangel Raphael too clever for humans and demons

 



by

Damien F. Mackey

  

The subtle angel may also have had modern biblical exegetes well in mind when,

in answer to the question of Tobias: ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media?

Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you;

I am familiar with the way …’. (Tobit 5:5-6).

  

The archangel Raphael appears in the form of a young man when Tobias is looking for someone to guide him to the land of Media at his father Tobit’s request (Tobit 5:3-8):

 

Then Tobit gave [Tobias] the receipt, and said to him, ‘Find a man to go with you and I will pay him wages as long as I live; and go and get the money’. So he went to look for a man; and he found Raphael, who was an angel, but Tobias did not know it. Tobias said to him, ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media? Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you; I am familiar with the way, and I have stayed with our brother Gabael’. Then Tobias said to him, ‘Wait for me, and I shall tell my father’. And he said to him, ‘Go, and do not delay’. So he went in and said to his father, ‘I have found some one to go with me’. He said, ‘Call him to me, so that I may learn to what tribe he belongs, and whether he is a reliable man to go with you’.

 

The ancient Greeks enjoyed this colourful incident so much that they absorbed it into The Odyssey, with Telemachus taking the place of Tobias and the disguised archangel, Raphael, being replaced by, not surprisingly, a Greek deity, in this case the goddess Athena disguised as the young man, Mentes.

 

Mentes (King of the Taphians) - Wikipedia

“In Book I, the Goddess Athena disguises herself as Mentes, an old family friend of Odysseus, when she goes to visit his son, Telemachus. Athena, disguised as him, tells Telemachus that he is sailing to the city of Temese with his own crew, claiming that he is in search of bronze. …. Although Mentes had hardly any appearances in Greek myths of earlier antiquity, he became a symbol of a guardian and a mentor. …”.

 

While Raphael will help Tobias get the money (silver), Mentes “is in search of bronze”.

 

Tobit, old and presently blind, will be no match for the tricky Raphael when Tobit attempts to learn the young man’s name and origins (vv. 9-15):

 

So Tobias invited him in; he entered and they greeted each other. Then Tobit said to him, ‘My brother, to what tribe and family do you belong? Tell me’. But he answered, ‘Are you looking for a tribe and a family or for a man whom you will pay to go with your son?’ And Tobit said to him, ‘I should like to know, my brother, your people and your name’. He replied, ‘I am Azarias the son of the great Ananias, one of your relatives’. Then Tobit said to him, ‘You are welcome, my brother. Do not be angry with me because I tried to learn your tribe and family. You are a relative of mine, of a good and noble lineage. For I used to know Ananias and Jathan, the sons of the great Shemaiah, when we went together to Jerusalem to worship and offered the first-born of our flocks and the tithes of our produce. They did not go astray in the error of our brethren. My brother, you come of good stock. But tell me, what wages am I to pay you—a drachma a day, and expenses for yourself as for my son? 

 

And besides, I will add to your wages if you both return safe and sound’. So they agreed to these terms.

 

Surely, this must be the same elusive being as the mysterious one, “the man”, with whom the patriarch Jacob had wrestled and had hoped to wrest from him his identity – but to no avail (Genesis 32:24-29):

 

So Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak. When the man saw that he could not overpower him, he touched the socket of Jacob’s hip so that his hip was wrenched as he wrestled with the man. Then the man said, ‘Let me go, for it is daybreak’.

But Jacob replied, ‘I will not let you go unless you bless me’.

The man asked him, ‘What is your name?’

‘Jacob’, he answered.

Then the man said, ‘Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with humans and have overcome’.

Jacob said, ‘Please tell me your name’.

But he replied, ‘Why do you ask my name?’ Then he blessed him there.

 

Compare:

 

‘Please tell me your name’. (Genesis)

‘I should like to know, my brother, your people and your name’. (Tobit)

 

Jacob’s (and Tobit’s) question: ‘Please tell me your name’, like another ancient question, this time from Jacob’s father, Isaac, ‘Where is the lamb?’ (Genesis 22:7), will resound down through the centuries, until being definitively answered.

For, the angel Raphael will, late in the Book of Tobit, reveal his true identity (12:15): ‘ I am Raphael, one of the seven holy angels who present the prayers of the saints and enter into the presence of the glory of the Holy One’.

 

And Isaac’s question will be answered only upon the arrival of the Messiah whom Isaac had foreshadowed, when the Baptist declared: ‘Behold, the Lamb of God!’ (John 1:29).

 

The archangel had brilliantly chosen an identity that was both accurate in its meaning, and one that lulled Tobit into thinking that he was a relative from a good family.  

 

Likewise, in The Odyssey, the goddess Athena will portray herself as a family friend. For, as we read above: “… the Goddess Athena disguises herself as Mentes, an old family friend of Odysseus, when she goes to visit his son, Telemachus”.

 

Chris Cammarata has well explained the archangel Raphael’s resorting to subterfuge:

 

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn’t it a sin to lie? – Catholic Café

 

In the Book of Tobit, angel Raphael pretends he is Azariah, the son of Hananiah the elder. Why did the Angel lie? Isn’t it a sin to lie?

 

It is a sin to lie, but the angel isn’t exactly lying. In this situation it’s more like he isn’t revealing the whole truth–at least not yet.

 

The nature of St. Raphael’s mission required that he keep his angelic identity hidden. Other angels in the Old Testament did this as well. Angels are fearful, powerful, and glorious creatures–that’s why they often begin their messages with “do not be afraid!” Masking their angelic nature serves a practical purpose–and it also emphasizes that God is the one who deserves the glory, not the angel.

 

The reason St. Raphael gives the name Azariah to Tobit in the first place is because he urges the angel to tell him where he is from.  So Raphael gets around it with a funny trick: he gives Tobit and Tobiah the name “Azariah, son of Hananiah.” The name Azariah means “God has helped” and Hananiah means “God has shown mercy.” So basically Raphael is disguising his identity while at the same time secretly hinting at it–his whole mission, as revealed at the end of the story, began because Raphael brought their family’s prayer before the Lord and so was sent to help them (see Tobit 12:11-20). He calls himself a “kinsman” and an “Israelite” as a way of showing that they belong to the same spiritual family–the people of God.

 

So you can sort of think of Azariah as the angel’s “codename” for the mission!

 

And just to clear up any confusion on lying, the Catechism notes that “the right to the communication of the truth is not unconditional” (CCC 2488). We have to judge in particular situations whether it is the right time and circumstance to reveal the truth. Being truthful requires prudence, too. Also, “no one is bound to reveal the truth to someone who does not have the right to know it” (CCC 2489). In the case of St. Raphael, Tobit and his family didn’t have the right to know his true identity–but in the end, he reveals it to them to “declare the works of God with due honor” (Tobit 12:11).The irony in the story of Tobit is that when St. Raphael first enters Tobit’s house and greets him, he tells him: “Take courage! God’s healing is near; so take courage” (Tobit 5:10). What does the name Raphael mean? “God’s healing” (or “God heals”)!

 

More angelic tricks

 

And Raphael, having revealed his name, lets slip another secret.

He was not actually eating, as he had appeared to be, when he was Tobit’s family (12:19): “All these days I merely appeared to you and did not eat or drink, but you were seeing a vision”.

 

Early during their trek to the land of Media, at the River Tigris, the angel will have to intervene to save Tobias from being devoured by a fish (6:1-3):

 

Now as they proceeded on their way they came at evening to the Tigris river and camped there. Then the young man went down to wash himself. A fish leaped up from the river and would have swallowed the young man; and the angel said to him, ‘Catch the fish’. So the young man seized the fish and threw it up on the land.

 

In this incident, the brilliant archangel will demonstrate his breadth of knowledge of God’s created world, of the healing properties of vital parts of a fish, of demonology and exorcism: (vv. 4-8):

 

Then the angel said to him, ‘Cut open the fish and take the heart and liver and gall and put them away safely’. So the young man did as the angel told him; and they roasted and ate the fish.

And they both continued on their way until they came near to Ecbatana. 

 

Then the young man said to the angel, ‘Brother Azarias, of what use is the liver and heart and gall of the fish?’ He replied, ‘As for the heart and the liver, if a demon or evil spirit gives trouble to any one, you make a smoke from these before the man or woman, and that person will never be troubled again. And as for the gall, anoint with it a man who has white films in his eyes, and he will be cured’.

 

Young Tobias was in the care of a very astute travelling guide.

 

The subtle angel may also have had modern biblical exegetes well in mind when, in answer to the question of Tobias: ‘Can you go with me to Rages in Media? Are you acquainted with that region?’ The angel replied, ‘I will go with you; I am familiar with the way …’. (5:5-6).

For, according to Fr. D. Dumm, writing on “Tobit” for The Jerome Biblical Commentary, the angel was confused about the way, leading Tobias in the wrong direction: “[The angel] Raphael knows the journey of life far better than the route to Media!” But, unlike our ignorant generation, the archangel well knew that the land of Media was situated to the west, not to the east of Nineveh - a fact that Richard Erickson has recently demonstrated (2020) quite independently of the Book of Tobit:

 

A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

(5) A PROBLEM IN CHALDAEAN AND ELAMITE GEOGRAPHY

 

More angelic subtlety

 

As the travellers neared Ecbatana in Media, Raphael informs Tobias about the “beautiful and sensible” Sarah, his future wife (6:9-12):

 

When they approached Ecbatana, the angel said to the young man, ‘Brother, today we shall stay with Raguel. He is your relative, and he has an only daughter named Sarah. I will suggest that she be given to you in marriage, because you are entitled to her and to her inheritance, for you are her only eligible kinsman. The girl is also beautiful and sensible. Now listen to my plan. I will speak to her father, and as soon as we return from Rages we will celebrate the marriage. For I know that Raguel, according to the Law of Moses, cannot give her to another man without incurring the penalty of death, because you rather than any other man are entitled to the inheritance’.

 

Tobias, however, knowing that Sarah has been tormented by a demon who had already killed her previous seven husbands, is none too keen about this proposal (vv. 13-14):

 

Then the young man said to the angel, ‘Brother Azarias, I have heard that the girl has been given to seven husbands and that each died in the bridal chamber. Now I am the only son my father has, and I am afraid that if I go in I will die as those before me did, for a demon is in love with her, and he harms no one except those who approach her. So now I fear that I may die and bring the lives of my father and mother to the grave in sorrow on my account. And they have no other son to bury them’.

 

The resourceful angel, though, had already made preparations for this very situation (vv. 15-17):

 

But the angel said to him, ‘Do you not remember the words with which your father commanded you to take a wife from among your own people?

Now listen to me, brother, for she will become your wife; and do not worry about the demon, for this very night she will be given to you in marriage. When you enter the bridal chamber, you shall take live ashes of incense and lay upon them some of the heart and liver of the fish so as to make a smoke. Then the demon will smell it and flee away, and will never again return. And when you approach her, rise up, both of you, and cry out to the merciful God, and he will save you and have mercy on you. Do not be afraid, for she was destined for you from eternity. You will save her, and she will go with you, and I suppose that you will have children by her’. When Tobias heard these things, he fell in love with her and yearned deeply for her.

 

All went according to plan. Tobias and Sarah become happily married, and Asmodeus, “the worst of demons”, was bound by the archangel (8:3): “And when the demon smelled the odor he fled to the remotest parts of Egypt, and the angel bound him”.

 

In The Odyssey, the demon is substituted by the evil god, Poseidon, who had pursued Odysseus relentlessly, and who goes off to Ethiopia, “the farthest limits of mankind”.

 

Another subtlety – the archangel’s use of the word “suppose” (Tobit 6:17): ‘You will save [Sarah], and she will go with you, and I suppose [πολαμβάνω] that you will have children by her’.

Why does he say that?

Because, while he knows that Tobias and Sarah are, indeed, going to have children, many of them, he likewise knows that Tobias and Sarah, as Job and his wife, will tragically lose ten of them in one instant (Job 1:19).

 

The later Tobias-Job

 

Tobias-Job, as an old man, a prophet, still living at the time of the Medo-Persians, when the second Temple was nearing completion, and here under his Akkadian name, Habakkuk, will again be visited by he whom he had called in the Book of Job (16:19) his ‘witness … in heaven’, and his ‘advocate … on high’, surely the archangel Raphael.

 

The angel wants him to take food to Daniel, languishing in the den of lions in Babylon.

 

Once again, he who had a long time ago declared (Tobit 5:2): ‘…. I don’t know how to get to Media’, will now, as an old man, say to the angel: ‘Sir, I have never seen Babylon, and I know nothing about the den’. (Daniel 14:35).

 

The resourceful angel, typically, will quickly fix that problem (14:36): “Then the angel of the Lord took him by the crown of his head and carried him by his hair; with the speed of the wind he set him down in Babylon, right over the den”.

 

That’s what clever angels can do.

Friday, June 12, 2026

Plant that gave Jonah shade

 

 


“Over the years scholars have tried to identify the plant and worm.

While a good candidate for Jonah’s plant has been proposed,

the identity of the worm has proved elusive”.

Kevin Tuck

  

Jonah’s worm · Creation.com

 

Jonah’s worm

By Kevin Tuck

Published 24 Jun, 2024

 

The plant that sheltered Jonah, and the worm that destroyed the plant, might no longer be a mystery. After 2,500 years, scientists may have discovered their identity.

 

The biblical account of Jonah gives us wonderful examples of God’s mercy. First, mercy is given to a recalcitrant prophet, and then to the undeserving city of Nineveh.

 

Jonah had to learn obedience the hard way. The account tells us that Jonah was called to preach to Nineveh, but instead he decided to flee across the ocean to a distant land.

 

However, God’s calling could not be evaded. Events led to Jonah being thrown overboard, where he was swallowed by a great fish prepared by God. His life was spared, and he then went to Nineveh to preach.

Jonah was disappointed that the people repented, and so God showed Jonah his further wrong attitude through the object lesson of a plant and a ‘worm’:

 

Fig. 1. Jonah’s ‘vine’ Ricinus communis

 

Now the Lord God appointed a plant [qiqayon], and made it come up over Jonah, that it might be a shade over his head, to save him from his discomfort. So Jonah was exceedingly glad because of the plant. But when dawn came up the next day, God appointed a worm [tola] that attacked the plant, so that it withered (Jonah 4:6–7).

Olepa ricini

 

Over the years, scholars have tried to identify the plant and worm. While a good candidate for Jonah’s plant has been proposed, the identity of the worm has proved elusive. Now, after more than 2,500 years, it seems scientists may have discovered this.

 

Jonah’s plant

 

Over the years scholars have tried to identify the plant and worm. While a good candidate for Jonah’s plant has been proposed, the identity of the worm has proved elusive.

 

The Hebrew word qiqayon for the plant has been variously rendered as vineivy, or gourd in English translations. None of these is accurate. But there is now general agreement that qiqayon refers to the castor oil plant, Ricinus communis, which gains support from Church and Hebrew tradition.1 In AD 404, the Church Father Jerome suggested the plant was then known to the Syriac people. It was fast-growing and could stand without support, being neither a gourd nor ivy.2

 

The identification of Jonah’s ‘vine’ as the castor oil plant Ricinus is of interest to Bible scholars and entomologists because it is highly toxic. The leaves and seeds are poisonous, and the leaf extract makes a potent insecticide—therefore very few insects can feed on the plant. It is also toxic to people and animals, and ricin has even been used as a chemical weapon! (But castor oil, made from the seeds, is safe. First, because ricin hardly dissolves in oil, and more importantly, the oil is heated to 80 °C (176 °F) which denatures ricin.) So, how could a worm (tola) feed on Jonah’s plant if it is so poisonous?

 

Fig. 2. Leaf of Ricinus communis

 

‘New’ moth species described in Israel

 

Despite this toxicity, in recent years a beautiful species of tiger moth has been discovered in Israel, which in its caterpillar stage can feed upon Ricinus without harm. The moth was at first thought to be new to science and described under the name Olepa schleini.3 However, it has since been found to be the same species as Olepa ricini, which is known in Bangladesh, China, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.4 The caterpillars can cope with the toxins because they have very high activity of a detoxifying enzyme called glutathione S-transferase (GST).5

 

The habits of the caterpillars of O. ricini match the account given in the book of Jonah. They normally feed at night, and they can quickly destroy a Ricinus plant. (They also feed on useful plants such as cotton, maize, sweet potato, and banana.)

 

The caterpillars usually leave the plant before sunrise, and hide from the heat among dry leaves nearby.

 

Fig. 3. Larvae of Olepa ricini feeding on Ricinus communis (castor oil plant),

September 2017, Glilot, Israel.

 

Supernatural supplementing the natural

 

Jonah 4:10 says that the plant “came into being in a night and perished in a night”. Supernatural action is obviously involved with several aspects of the Jonah account, but in such a way that much of it still happens ‘naturally’:

 

Bible believers should not be surprised that the text of Scripture once again correlates with an aspect of observational science.

 

  • Jonah could not naturally survive unharmed for three days inside the belly of any ocean creature. But it may well be natural for one of the marine monsters in creation’s catalogue to swallow such a mammalian morsel.
  • Ricinus plant would not normally reach a size large enough to shade a man within a night—but it is rather fast-growing. Similarly:
  • The plant may well have succumbed faster than usual—but the natural destruction this caterpillar wreaks can be very rapid (fig. 3). And its attacks do take place at night, as the verse suggests.

 

It may appear surprising that an insect so destructive to Ricinus should have gone undocumented in the Middle East for so long, but the insect appears to be quite scarce there. While there are fears it may be on the verge of extinction, it has managed to survive for 2,500 years without anyone reporting on its behaviour.6

 

Summary and conclusion

 

This caterpillar’s feeding behaviour on Ricinus and its occurrence in the Middle East make it an extremely likely candidate for Jonah’s ‘worm’.1 Bible believers should not be surprised that the text of Scripture once again correlates with an aspect of observational science.

….

 

 

 

Monday, June 8, 2026

Pope Leo XIV’s real concern, to build up the City of God

 



Everyone has missed Pope Leo’s true enemy, and it’s not AI

 

Everyone has missed Pope Leo’s true enemy, and it’s not AI

 

Opinion by Elise Morrison

 

Pope Leo XIV’s much-anticipated first encyclical on safeguarding the human person in the time of AI was released last month to much fanfare and discussion. A renewal of the Rerum Novarum of Pope Leo XIII (1891), this encyclical sought to speak of the “res novae (new issues) of our time” – such as AI.

 

As he writes: “Humanity, created by God in all its grandeur, is today facing a pivotal choice: either to construct a new Tower of Babel or to build the city in which God and humanity dwell together.”

 

Commentators thus far seemed to have focused on what he has to say about what he calls the “Babel syndrome”, yet have missed something significant: most of the encyclical is dedicated to the more fundamental Christian question of how we might think about building the City of God here on earth, how we can work together to “foster a peaceful, just and dignified life in community within today’s ‘cities’”.

 

If you’re not Catholic, you might be asking: “Well, what does it matter what the Pope has to say?”

 

Nearly 20 years after the financial crisis of 2008, amid the climate crisis and the mental health crisis, with wars in Ukraine and Iran, the turmoil of Donald Trump’s second term, and, as the encyclical is concerned with, the rise of an artificial intelligence which no longer serves us, but we serve it, it is clear that the modern world isn’t working for us.

 

The Pope’s encyclical has a message that is more fundamental than

a critique of AI - Remo Casilli/Reuters

 

The real problem is that the current political offerings available to us are fundamentally untethered from what Catholic social teaching might call “the Good” or “the Real”, and instead remain beholden to the technocratic doctrines that have prevailed for much of the post-Cold War period.

 

Today’s politics have prioritised efficiency and profit over the values of peace, justice, and fraternity. Pope Leo’s encyclical, by contrast, draws on the Church’s “ancient wisdom” to generate fresh ways of approaching social, political and economic questions.

 

The proliferation of AI is just one symptom of this broken society. If we are unable to connect our use of technology to virtues which serve us, we will remain servants to it.

And so the Pope warns us: “When it [technology] becomes the standard by which everything is judged, it begins to dictate what matters and what can be discarded, reducing creation to an object of exploitation and human beings to mere cogs in a system driven toward ever greater efficiency.”

 

But it’s not difficult to look around and see how life more generally has become transactional in the past 50 years.

 

Saturday, June 6, 2026

‘Unless you eat my Body and drink my Blood’

 

 


 

‘Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life;

and I will raise him up at the last day’.

 

John 6:54

 

 

Pope: 'Keep beautiful witness of Corpus Christi processions alive'

 

Pope: 'Keep beautiful witness of Corpus Christi processions alive'

 

During his Wednesday General Audience, Pope Leo XIV recalled that Thursday marks the Solemnity of Corpus Christi, encouraging the faithful to keep alive the public witness of faith made visible in Corpus Christi processions around the world.

 

He also offered heartfelt words of prayer and accompaniment to priests and religious in the Middle East.

 

Jun 03, 2026

Related News

 

 

By Deborah Castellano Lubov

"An expression of popular Eucharistic devotion is found in the processions with the Blessed Sacrament that take place in the streets of many towns and countries; in this regard, I encourage you to keep alive this beautiful manifestation of public witness to the faith."

 

Pope Leo XIV expressed this sentiment during his Wednesday General Audience, recalling that this week the Church celebrates the Solemnity of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ.

 

The Pope encouraged the faithful to participate in this tradition, recalling that "In the Eucharist we contemplate Jesus, bread broken and given for each one of us."

 

In his greetings to the faithful, the Pope also offered special words of closeness to priests and religious serving in the Middle East.

"I accompany with my prayer and my blessing your ministry and the hopes of your respective countries."

 

The Holy Father also greeted the Daughters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, the members of the Montfortian Family, and the Sisters of Our Lady of the Cenacle, encouraging them "to be a sign of hope for all those who thirst for God, for His truth, and for His peace."--Vatican News

 

Today (7th June, 2026) is the feast of  Corpus Christi

 

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Neanderthals could speak

 

 


“As well as archaeological artefacts, researchers also point to similarities

in their vocal anatomy with modern humans and their known cognitive abilities. Neanderthals had larger brains, on average, than modern humans and while

this doesn’t mean they were necessarily smarter, it does suggest they were

a highly intelligent species - just like us”.

Will Newton

 

This comes as no surprise whatsoever to me (Damien Mackey).

See e.g. my articles:

 

Neanderthals need to be re-written

 

(5) Neanderthals need to be rewritten

 

Messing with the Neanderthals

 

(5) Messing with the Neanderthals

 

See also Dr. Jack Cuozzo’s book:

 

And, again:

 

New Shocking Discovery About Neanderthals Changes EVERYTHING!

 

Recent discoveries have revealed that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens in the mid-Middle Paleolithic Levant not only coexisted but actively interacted, sharing technology, lifestyles, and burial customs. These interactions fostered cultural exchange, social complexity, and behavioral innovations, such as formal burial practices and the symbolic use of ochre for decoration. The findings suggest that human connections, rather than isolation, were key drivers of technological and cultural advancements, highlighting the Levant as a crucial crossroads in early human history.

 

We read at:

They interbred – but could humans and neanderthals actually talk to each other? | Discover Wildlife

 

They interbred – but could humans and neanderthals actually talk to each other?

 

Our ancestors lived alongside Neanderthals for nearly 200,000 years [sic], often interbreeding with them. But could they understand one another?

….

Will Newton

 

Published: May 25, 2026 at 2:46 am


 

We might be the only species of human alive today, but just a few hundred thousand years ago [sic] there were a handful of different species living across the world.

 

The Neanderthals were one of these species, and … they’re our closest cousins.

 

….

 

How closely related are we to Neanderthals?

 

It was long thought that we (Homo sapiens) evolved from Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) and that these stocky ‘almost-humans’ were a transitional phase between chimpanzees and modern humans. This ‘March of Progress’-style image is often how our evolutionary history is depicted, but it couldn’t be further from the truth.

 

 

Instead, modern humans and Neanderthals are sister species that evolved from the same common ancestor [sic], diverging from one another roughly half-a-million years ago. As a species, Neanderthals emerged earlier than modern humans, roughly 400,000 years ago compared to 300,000 years ago, but it wasn’t until 130,000 years ago that ‘classic Neanderthals’ really appeared.

….

Regardless of who this common ancestor was, genetic studies show that Neanderthals are our closest relatives and share up to 99.7% of our DNA. These similarities run so deep that some suggest Neanderthals may actually represent a subspecies of Homo sapiens and should be renamed Homo sapiens neanderthalensis.

 

Could Neanderthals speak?

 

The linguistic ability of Neanderthals has long been debated. From their discovery in the mid 19th century until quite recently, they were often portrayed as dim-witted ‘cavemen’, their communicative abilities thought to be limited to grunts and simple gestures.

….

 

It’s clear from the wealth of archaeological artefacts left by Neanderthals alone that this was simply not the case. The discovery of clothes, jewellery, weapons, and sophisticated homes crafted by Neanderthals paint a picture of people who could not only communicate, but collaborate and even create art.

 

As well as archaeological artefacts, researchers also point to similarities in their vocal anatomy with modern humans and their known cognitive abilities. Neanderthals had larger brains, on average, than modern humans and while this doesn’t mean they were necessarily smarter, it does suggest they were a highly intelligent species - just like us.

 

In order to find out just how well Neanderthals could speak, a team of researchers from the University of Iowa examined their genetic code for genomic regions known as ‘human ancestor quickly evolving regions’, or HAQERS. These aren’t genes, rather sequences that affect how and when certain genes are expressed, and they’ve been shown to have a large effect on human language development.

 

What these researchers found as part of a study published in April, 2026, surprised them. Neanderthals not only had HAQERS, but they were even more prominent than those found in humans today ….

 

If that was the case, and Neanderthals were capable of language, surely they could have found ways to communicate with the humans they bumped into - right?

 

Could humans and Neanderthals communicate?

 

It’s clear, based on the genetic evidence, that humans and Neanderthals regularly ‘bumped’ into one another - in more ways than one…

 

In 2010, researchers successfully sequenced the Neanderthal genome and discovered that modern humans of non-African descent carry roughly 2% Neanderthal DNA in their genomes. Some populations carry even more: the proportion in East Asian populations can be as high as 4%!

 

This genetic evidence proves that humans and Neanderthals interbred quite regularly, and suggests some may have even lived together in mixed groups. The individuals living in these mixed groups, nurturing and raising hybrid offspring, must have been able to communicate to some degree. ….